McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama Selecting Biden - Rasmussen & Gallup

This is not a concern troll diary, I am 100% behind Obama and have been for a while.  However todays Rasmussen tracker is seriously worrying me.

It went from

Obama +3

To

Tied

From yesterday to today, suggesting McCain got a big bump coming out of the weekend.  This is horrible news considering Obama announced his VP to some pretty good press.  Is this just PUMA's moving even further away due to Hillary not being picked, or did Obama just make huge mistake in this selection?

Thoughts?

Update - McCain is now UP 2 in Gallup's tracking. I think now it is time to panic.


Poll
Will Obama See A Convention Bounce?
Yes
No

Votes: 18
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


THIS IS GREAT NEWS FOR HILLARY CLINTON! (1.00 / 4)


by Dale Johnson 007 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:23:46 AM EST

How is a dem falling behind (none / 0)

great news for any democrat, troll?


by IowaMike on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:36:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How is a dem falling behind (none / 0)

No, my comment is meant to mock this PUMAs insistence on bashing Obama.


by Dale Johnson 007 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:42:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How is a dem falling behind (none / 0)

Sorry, my bad....


by IowaMike on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:32:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama's job got harder (2.00 / 1)

His campaign would have been a lot easier had he picked Clinton.  I think that would have been a slam dunk winner in Nov.  

Of course the next 4 to 8 years would have been hell.  

Clinton wouldn't have been a good number two.  I am not convinced she even wanted to be number 2.  Obama may not have asked for the fear of looking bad had she said no.  Who knows.

Either way the ticket isn't big enough for the both of them in my opinion.

But now he has even more alienated Clinton supporters to round up and bring back home.  More work to do.  In the end Biden may help win a few them over with his working class Catholic roots.


by RichardFlatts on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:24:53 AM EST

Re: Obama's job got harder (2.00 / 1)

blame Bill. Personally, I think he would've had little problem picking her if not for the prospect of Bill hovering around, wagging his finger on TV, pushing for his share of the spotlight, and being the constant distraction that he was during the primary. We all know the media hungers for more YouTube moments out of him, and they'd be covering him full-bore until they got some.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:31:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's job got harder (none / 0)

I think that's one of the biggest reasons for not picking Hillary. No offense to either of them, but it really would have turned into having two vice-presidents and probably would have been a muddle. Three people with large egos is just too many.


by Gorelab on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:33:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's job got harder (none / 0)

I sorry but really this is total nonsense.  Bill Clinton has a very busy life and does a ton of things and he has no interest in a BO presidency or how it is run.  I really find it funny that democrats say things like this.  Clinton is an extremely popular president.

david


by giusd on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:36:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's job got harder (none / 0)

Huh? He had a very busy life and a ton of things to do during the primaries, but that didn't stop him from a major story every day, often for the wrong reasons.

The man eats and breathes politics. Yes, I'm sure he's the head of some foundations, and makes humanitarian trips abroad and all that. But do you think he'd really be able to stay secluded and out of the way if his wife were the vice president??

It's not just about whether he'd be a "shadow president" if the ticket had won. It's what he'd be doing on the campaign trail up until then. The media has an extremely antagonistic attitude toward him at this point. They want him to slip up, and he often obliges.

For an Obama campaign that's prided itself on "no drama," it would be antithetic to have Bill closely attached to his campaign. It's difficult to get your message out when the daily lead story would be, "What did that wacky Bill Clinton say today?"


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 12:19:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's job got harder (none / 0)

A convention bounce is nice but not necessary. His veep pick wasn't sexxy so it didn't attract immediate attention. Also so much of this campaign is focused on the clintons and uniting the party that he may not get much of a bounce from it. but in the long run the platform is good and the message is good and once biden starts attacking mccain his attributes will be appreciated.


Elections 2008 Best reality show ever!!!
by kbal on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:47:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's job got harder (none / 0)

Hard to answer the alternate question: Would the numbers have been reversed if Hillary WAS the VP pick?

Would the independent numbers have changed?

THAT is where the polls have shifted, the reluctant Clinton factor was already there?

Now, I think Obama needs to fight for BOTH of those weakness, though I am of the mind that at least a percentage of the Clinton crowd is gone, no matter what happens from here on out.

According to NPR, in comparison to Gore and Kerry, Obama is NOT far behind in women, it's basically demographic of older voters.

And, ONE group he is way behind in, white older Roman Catholics.

So, this was a gamble, not without risk, that Biden can get those folks on board.

Unlike a lot of folks, I think the Clinton factor is not trivial, and might decide this in states like Ohio and Michigan.


On Nov 4th, we elected "the smart guy" and the world celebrated!
by WashStateBlue on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:14:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The Clinton factor (none / 0)

was never trivial, but it is ridiculous. Does anyone really know what the Vice Presidency is? If they did, they probably would not want Clinton there.

I mean it's like saying "If Hillary can't sit in the chariot, then Obama better make her pull it!"

it's idiotic.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:24:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama Selecting Bide (2.00 / 2)

For pete's sake, it's a tracking poll. I barely pay attention to them. If you wanted a big splash in the polls, then it would've had to be Hillary, Gore or someone similarly high-profile. I saw another poll that said the vast majority of respondents didn't know much or anything about Biden and didn't have an opinion of him. What did you expect?

I'd think Biden's "bounce" would be delayed and gradual--the more undecideds hear and see him, the more they'll come around to the idea of him supplementing Obama in certain areas. I'd imagine it would have more impact down the stretch than it does initially. (Imagine Biden debating a Pawlenty on national security issues.)

Another big hope is that Biden can shore up support in states like Pennsylvania and Ohio, or among seniors who voted for Hillary. That won't necessarily show up in a poll.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:27:16 AM EST

Oh god (2.00 / 1)

(Imagine Biden debating a Pawlenty on national security issues.)

That would be glorious.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:31:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re (2.00 / 1)

I'm not sure this is connected, at least until we see how the next few days of the poll are. It could be because of Biden, it could be unrelated, it could just be noise.


by Gorelab on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:29:04 AM EST

Re: Re (none / 0)

Obviously we cannot say for sure that it is Biden and noise is always a factor.  But it should be noted that the Ras poll with leaners has only moved 3 points in a single day once since the end of primary season.  Moving 3 points is big because it actually means that the difference between Friday's data and Monday's data was 9 points (since the polls released today and yesterday share data from Saturday and Sunday).  If its just noise, its pretty big and rare noise.  Its much more likely that something happened between Friday and Monday that negatively affected Obama's poll numbers (his own support dropped six points between those days and helped McCain) and the choice of Biden rather than HRC is the pretty likely explanation.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:50:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Two things (none / 0)

A) It's a tracking poll that changed within the margin for error.

B) It's Rasmussen; they pretty consistantly under-poll Democrats.

Okay, I lied.  Three things:

C) I hardly think that any polls just prior to the Convention are going to matter much.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:34:15 AM EST

Re: Two things (none / 0)

It is not within MoE to have a shift of 9 points from Friday's data to Monday's data.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:51:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Two things (none / 0)

Rasmussen disagrees. "Obama's support has declined in each of the last three individual nights of polling. This may be either statistical noise or a reaction to the selection of Biden."
by Loreg on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Two things (none / 0)

Well duh.  Anything can always be statistical noise and so they always have this disclaimer.  The point of MoE is to get a handle on how likely this is to be purely statistical noise and the probability of that is likely somewhere around or just south of .05.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:34:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Well, I think Obama will get a convention bounce, but it will not be as large. If McCain is bold and chooses a bold and exciting VP, McCain could come out with a larger convention bounce than Obama. We need to exploit the fact that Bush and Cheney is going to speak on Monday. The biggest problem for Obama is that this convention as become "Can the Clinton's unite the Party."

Still, it does look like this may be the first negative "bounce" from a VP selection in a long time. I still think Obama will win though and win big in November.


Restore America's Strength.
by RJEvans on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:35:14 AM EST

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Who is this bold and exciting GOP VP waiting in the wings??? Romney? Captain Underpants?


by Dale Johnson 007 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:43:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

I said bold and exicitng, meaning we don't know who it will be. It could be a woman, it could be Powell or Petraeus or Jesus. I don't know.


Restore America's Strength.
by RJEvans on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:57:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

You do know that Petraeus can't do that unless he quit his post right? Do you really think he would do that? Powell? They'll have TWO over 70 guys on the ticket. You think age is a factor now...just wait for that bombshell.


by applejackking on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:11:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

I think Petraeus as political aspirations, but I'm not sure if he is a Democrat or a Republican. My suspicion is that he is a Democrat. Powell may be over 70 but he has the energy of a 40 year old and he looks pretty good too. Age will not be a factor especially given the fact that he is liked by 60%+ of America. Age is a factor for Democrats just like experience is a factor for Republicans.


Restore America's Strength.
by RJEvans on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:19:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Sarah Palin, the Governor of Alaska would be a huge boost to McCain.  She would energize this campaign and be able to bring in lots of Hillary voters, moderates, and independants.  Plus she keeps McCain's base united because she is fairly conservative and pro-life.  She's smart, young, energetic and has a personal life story that is very appealing.  She is a no-brainer if McCain wants to boost his appeal even more.  He'll win the election if he picks her.  She actually has more executive experience and overall experience than Obama.


by karajan72 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Yeah, because women want a pres who will appoint judges to overturn Roe V Wade!


by IowaMike on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 01:09:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Palin's mired in a scandal in Alaska right now. dream on.


by Dale Johnson 007 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 08:15:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Bold and exciting, repug?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa.......

I think I wet myself....


by IowaMike on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 01:10:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Grow up...


Restore America's Strength.
by RJEvans on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 04:23:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Some Dems were disappointed (none / 0)

since Obama didn't pick Hillary but I still say that perhaps Obama would have won but his first 4 years in the White house would have been HELL and may have cost him a 2nd term.

I agree with Begala when he said that the way to unite the Hillary and Obama factions of the party is to find a common enemy and that is Bush/McCain.  

Just as the Repubs united for McCain because their common enemy is Obama, the Dems will unite for Obama if their common enemy is Bush/McCain.


by puma on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:35:46 AM EST

We Democrats are not as good at that (none / 0)

If we lose this it's not going to be the usual reason; independents going GOP.  If we lose this it's going to be because of primary rift in the party which seems less and less able to be fixed.  I think it is stupid.  In my 40+ years of being politically involved I've never seen anything quite like it.  I think we need to put the entire primary behind us.  

I also think that does not seem like it is happening and that the polling dips are probably more from reluctant and angry and petulant Democrats than independent voters.  

Party politics works this way:  You hold a primary.  Someone is declared the winner.  You all fall in line or get out of the Party.  There's time to fight any residual battles later on.  The GOP gets this, we do not seem to.


by mady on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:49:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The more I think about it (none / 0)

the more I see Joe Biden as the perfect choice. Personally, if my candidate lost the primary, I don't think I'd want him or her to be Vice President. It's such a pointless job.

Why would any of you want to take Hillary Clinton out of the Senate to be Vice President? It doesn't make any sense


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:54:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The Tracking Polls Are Just Erratic (none / 0)

I don't think Obama was really expecting a bounce, since he knew he was going to have some upset Hillary supporters. I do think we'll see a bounce out of the convention simply because I think we'll draw some true Democrats back in after a few days of beating our agenda. Plus, Obama's speech looks to be packed with concrete ideas, and that will also help.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:44:24 AM EST

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama (none / 0)

Correlation does not prove causation.  The daily tracking polls are always noisy.


by rfahey22 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:49:04 AM EST

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama (none / 0)

The Ras tracker with leaners has moved 3 points in a single day exactly one other time since the beginning of June.

Its far from the end of the world and the big thing is that we put on a good convention and see good numbers coming out of the convention, but let's not just dismiss this for the sake of convenience.  The smart money suggests that picking Biden hurt Obama in the very short term.  There's really no way of getting around that.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:52:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama (none / 0)

3 points is in the MOE.


by IowaMike on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:36:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama (none / 0)

The difference between Friday and Monday's results is 9 points, which is way outside the MoE and is the appropriate statistic to be looking at with a tracking poll.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 01:55:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary would have been a game changer. (none / 0)


Let's not be surprised if a VP who is not a game changer did not change the game.

The game remains unchanged, tieD, with Obama marginally ahead.

Now brace yourself for a female VP pick from McCain.


by TaiChiMaster on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 10:57:57 AM EST

Female VP pick (none / 0)

wouldn't surprise me, McCain already thinks women are stupid.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:02:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary would have been a game changer. (none / 0)

So, Palin or Kay Bailey?

Not going to be Condi or Carly F.

Each of those two women has risks, but
they are pro-life.

The other two I listed are pro-choice, or Condi is at least not a fire-breather on pro-life.

I still think Mitt or Pawlenty, but, I do think the Republics might try a curve ball.

I'm thinking IF they go for it, it's Palin.


On Nov 4th, we elected "the smart guy" and the world celebrated!
by WashStateBlue on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:18:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary would have been a game changer. (none / 0)


If he picks condi, it's over.
by TaiChiMaster on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 12:07:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

For McCain? (none / 0)


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 12:37:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary would have been a game changer. (none / 0)


Well you were right...

It's Palin


by TaiChiMaster on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:55:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Let's wait until after the convention (none / 0)

if Obama is not registering at least at 50% in either Gallup or Rasmussen, then it's probably time to reevaluate what happened.  We've got the heavy hitters coming up (HRC, Biden, and Obama); if these three cannot move any numbers and we're tied after the convention, we're probably screwed.  But let's wait and see what the numbers are before we blame Biden.


by Blazers Edge on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:07:25 AM EST

Re: Let's wait until after the convention (none / 0)

McCain has no ground game - none.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 05:22:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't take me wrong (none / 0)


Biden is an Ok Choice.

He is far better than one of those nobody like Tim Kaine who would have sunk the ticket.


by TaiChiMaster on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:07:57 AM EST

Re: McCain (none / 0)

IMHO we all should have known that BO numbers would go down if he didnt name HEC as his VP.  But my guess is this is a blip and not a serious shift.  IMHO after HRC speaks on Wed our numbers will begin to move up and this will continue after Thursday acceptance speach.

david


by giusd on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:25:52 AM EST

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce (none / 0)

Those who hang on daily polls and read their portents are doomed to pointless misery.


"I don't know too much about Sarah Palin, but perhaps that's the good news." -- GOP Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
by Obama44 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 12:40:13 PM EST

Re: McCain Gets A Bounce From Obama Selecting Bide (none / 0)

It makes complete sense that 2% of the electorate would be composed of Dems who wanted Obama to pick Clinton, and now that he didn't they're flirting with voting for McCain.  This number, let's face it, could have been much bigger.  It's an open question whether this reflects any sort of hard preference.  During the primaries poll numbers would jump around by a few points to reflect whatever recent incident made people upset (and that's probably what's happening here).  Could Obama lose this thing?  Sure.

Here's the good scenario.  Now that Obama has picked his VP it's possible all of the "bad news" is now behind him.  I don't see any new big disclosures coming out.  Democrats who are upset because Obama is not Clinton will have to decide in the end whether they really want to vote for McCain.  Some will, others won't, and the result of the election will probably turn on how that shakes out.

I think McCain will take a similar hit, btw, once he names his VP.  He doesn't have any great choices.  I'm still hoping he does something crazy like name Lieberman or Ridge (watch the GOP base go berserk), but if he taps a Romney or Huckabee the Dems who are now on the fence will get the reminder they need that McCain is still a Republican.

The bad scenario, of course, will be if we discover after Labor Day that the country's desire to vote out the Republicans just isn't as strong as the anger which some Clinton supporters have towards Obama or the dislike some Americans have about the prospect of voting for a black candidate in general (which is still one of the powerful undercurrents of this race).

What ever happens, panicking will solve nothing.  If you think about it, there are just too many reasons not to trust that the polls are an accurate indicator of what the outcome will be on election day (the US hasn't had a generation gap this large in a long time, no one knows what turnout will be, the race issue complicates things, as does the common perception that the country is on the "wrong track", there could be some big swings either way during the last two weeks).

So don't worry.  But yes, the Dems could lose.  Nothing worth doing is easy.    


by IncognitoErgoSum on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 01:55:20 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.